DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Audi 100 vs 1988 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
100ModelColt
1987Model year1988
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,7 s
0 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
113 HPPower160 HP
165 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4793 mmLength3950 mm
1814 mmWidth1670 mm
1422 mmHeight1380 mm
1290 KgWeight1010 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Audi 100 and 1988 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…