2012 • Honda
N-Box
Honda N-Box 0.7i (58 Hp) 2012Overall Score55.5/100
2012 Honda N-Box vs 2015 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 0.9 TwinAir Turbo (105 Hp) 2015Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo MiTo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda N-BoxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
HondaMakeAlfa Romeo
N-BoxModelMiTo
2012Model year2015
MPVBody typeHatchback
4Seats4/5
5Doors3
Performance
Honda N-BoxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
—0–100 km/h11,4 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement875 cc
58 HPPower105 HP
65 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders2
Fuel & Consumption
Honda N-BoxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Honda N-BoxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVTGears6
145/80 R13; 155/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Honda N-BoxSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
3395 mmLength4063 mm
1475 mmWidth1720 mm
1800 mmHeight1446 mm
1000-1010 KgWeight1130 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Honda N-Box and 2015 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…