DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 100 vs 1994 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
AudiMakeMazda
100Model323
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
12,6 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
182 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
101 HPPower103 HP
157 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
4790 mmLength4260 mm
1777 mmWidth1680 mm
1431 mmHeight1340 mm
1310 KgWeight1120 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 100 and 1994 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…