E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Ascona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
AudiMakeOpel
100ModelAscona
1982Model year1981
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors2/4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
12,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
170 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1921 ccEngine displacement1979 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
146 NmTorque159 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size185/70 R13

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
4683 mmLength4321 mm
1768 mmWidth1670 mm
1390 mmHeight1380 mm
1170 KgWeight980 Kg
2677 mmWheelbase2518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Ford SierraVS1982 Audi 100Ford Sierra vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Opel MantaVS1982 Audi 100Opel Manta vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Chevrolet MonzaVS1982 Audi 100Chevrolet Monza vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1981 Opel AsconaVS1982 Audi 100Opel Ascona vs Audi 1001981 and 1982 model years1983 Audi 100VS1982 Audi 100Audi 100 vs Audi 1001983 and 1982 model years

Comments are loading…