DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Honda FIT vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationFord C-Max
HondaMakeFord
FITModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
143 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationFord C-Max
3830 mmLength4330 mm
1675 mmWidth1820 mm
1525 mmHeight1600 mm
1010 KgWeight1292 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Honda FIT and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…