DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
HondaMakeVolvo
FITModelS60
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower122 HP
134 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo S60
3955 mmLength4635 mm
1695 mmWidth1865 mm
1525 mmHeight1484 mm
1080 KgWeight1605 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…