DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeRenault
FITModelScenic
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
134 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption4,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R20 95H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4406 mm
1695 mmWidth1866 mm
1525 mmHeight1653 mm
1080 KgWeight1430 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2734 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…