DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda FIT vs 2013 Kia Pro Cee'd Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Pro Cee'd

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeKia
FITModelPro Cee'd
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1582 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
134 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4310 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1525 mmHeight1430 mm
1080 KgWeight1490 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda FIT and 2013 Kia Pro Cee'd approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Pro Cee'd leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…