DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Honda FIT vs 2006 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeRenault
FITModelClio
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1339 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
86 HPPower86 HP
119 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14 STyre size185/60/R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3830 mmLength3818 mm
1675 mmWidth1639 mm
1525 mmHeight1417 mm
980 KgWeight1175 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Honda FIT and 2006 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…