DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Honda FIT vs 2003 Audi A2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda FIT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

52.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationAudi A2
HondaMakeAudi
FITModelA2
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationAudi A2
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1339 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
86 HPPower75 HP
119 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationAudi A2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationAudi A2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14 STyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationAudi A2
3830 mmLength3826 mm
1675 mmWidth1673 mm
1525 mmHeight1553 mm
980 KgWeight995 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2405 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Honda FIT and 2003 Audi A2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda FIT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…