DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Acura RL vs 2003 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura RLSpecificationAlpina B3
AcuraMakeAlpina
RLModelB3
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura RLSpecificationAlpina B3
6,7 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
215 km/hTop speed270 km/h
3471 ccEngine displacement3346 cc
304 HPPower305 HP
347 NmTorque362 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura RLSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura RLSpecificationAlpina B3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/50 R17Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura RLSpecificationAlpina B3
4917 mmLength4471 mm
1847 mmWidth1739 mm
1452 mmHeight1414 mm
1845 KgWeight1450 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Acura RL and 2003 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…