DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda Elysion vs 2013 Isuzu MU-X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Elysion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeIsuzu
ElysionModelMU-X
2012Model year2013
MinivanBody typeSUV
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
265 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,0 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16; 255/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4920 mmLength4825 mm
1845 mmWidth1860 mm
1810 mmHeight1825-1830 mm
2020 KgWeight1985-2025 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda Elysion and 2013 Isuzu MU-X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Elysion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…