DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
100ModelAD
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationNissan AD
12,6 s0–100 km/h—
176 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower76 HP
142 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationNissan AD
4793 mmLength4175 mm
1814 mmWidth1665 mm
1421 mmHeight1480 mm
1160 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…