DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
100ModelLancer
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
176 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1755 cc
90 HPPower94 HP
150 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14

Dimensions

4793 mmLength4115 mm
1814 mmWidth1635 mm
1421 mmHeight1415 mm
1200 KgWeight1160 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…