DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Honda CR-Z vs 2010 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSeat
CR-ZModelAltea
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeMPV
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
200 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
114 HPPower125 HP
145 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4078 mmLength4282 mm
2013 mmWidth1768 mm
1395 mmHeight1576 mm
1147 KgWeight1439 Kg
2435 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Honda CR-Z and 2010 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…