DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda CR-V vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMitsubishi
CR-VModelTriton
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2356 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
184 HPPower136 HP
244 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
CVTGears5
235/65 R17Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4587 mmLength5280 mm
1854 mmWidth1815 mm
1679 mmHeight1780 mm
1500 KgWeight1820 Kg
2659 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda CR-V and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…