DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda CR-V vs 2017 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 12.5 points.

60.25–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeHonda
CR-VModelCR-V
2013Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
182 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
155 HPPower160 HP
192 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank53 lt
10 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/60 R18Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4587 mm
1820 mmWidth1854 mm
1685 mmHeight1679 mm
1542 KgWeight1700 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2659 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda CR-V and 2017 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 12.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…