DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Honda CR-V vs 2002 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.

60.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeHonda
CR-VModelCR-V
2009Model year2002
CrossoverBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
192 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/65 R17Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4520 mm
1820 mmWidth1750 mm
1680 mmHeight1675 mm
1498 KgWeight1490 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Honda CR-V and 2002 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…