DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda CR-V vs 2011 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeNissan
CR-VModelX-Trail
2016Model year2011
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
160 HPPower173 HP
350 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
9Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/60 R18Tyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4605 mmLength4635 mm
2096 mmWidth1790 mm
1685 mmHeight1700 mm
1658 KgWeight1615 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda CR-V and 2011 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…