DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda CR-V vs 2011 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 21.5 points.

70.5–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda CR-VSpecificationFord Kuga
HondaMakeFord
CR-VModelKuga
2016Model year2011
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda CR-VSpecificationFord Kuga
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
197 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement0 cc
160 HPPower163 HP
350 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Honda CR-VSpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda CR-VSpecificationFord Kuga
4x4Drivetrain4x4
9Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda CR-VSpecificationFord Kuga
4605 mmLength4443 mm
2096 mmWidth1842 mm
1685 mmHeight1710 mm
1658 KgWeight1692 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda CR-V and 2011 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 21.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…