DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Honda CR-V vs 2014 Mazda Axela Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Axela

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
CR-VModelAxela
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
300 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/65 R17Tyre size195/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4405 mm
1820 mmWidth1745 mm
1685 mmHeight1465 mm
1541 KgWeight1240 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Honda CR-V and 2014 Mazda Axela approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Axela leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…