DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Honda CR-V vs 2016 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

62.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeHonda
CR-VModelCR-V
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
182 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank58 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4605 mm
1820 mmWidth2096 mm
1685 mmHeight1685 mm
1541 KgWeight1545 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Honda CR-V and 2016 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…