E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1968 Audi 100 vs 1968 Saab 96 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
AudiMakeSaab
100Model96
1968Model year1968
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors2

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
13,5 s0–100 km/h—
156 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1761 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
80 HPPower65 HP
135 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank38 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
4590 mmLength4170 mm
1729 mmWidth1575 mm
1421 mmHeight1473 mm
1050 KgWeight873 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2498 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1968 Audi 100 and 1968 Saab 96 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1968 Saab 99VS1968 Audi 100Saab 99 vs Audi 1001968 and 1968 model years1968 Moskvich 427VS1968 Audi 100Moskvich 427 vs Audi 1001968 and 1968 model years1968 Saab 96VS1968 Audi 100Saab 96 vs Audi 1001968 and 1968 model years1968 Volkswagen KaeferVS1968 Audi 100Volkswagen Kaefer vs Audi 1001968 and 1968 model years1969 Moskvich 434VS1968 Audi 100Moskvich 434 vs Audi 1001969 and 1968 model years

Comments are loading…