DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Civic vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeLand Rover
CivicModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
235 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
196 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
205/45 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength4433 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1425 mmHeight1709 mm
1200 KgWeight1550 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Civic and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…