1986 • Audi
100
Audi 100 1.8 (75 Hp) 1986Overall Score51.25/100
1986 Audi 100 vs 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1986 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 (C12V) 1986Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
AudiMakeMitsubishi
100ModelLancer
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1468 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
138 NmTorque102 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4793 mmLength4113 mm
1814 mmWidth1635 mm
1422 mmHeight1415 mm
1080 KgWeight900 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2380 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1986 Audi 100 and 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…