1983 • Audi
100
Audi 100 1.8 (75 Hp) 1983Overall Score51.25/100
1983 Audi 100 vs 1983 Volvo 340-360 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1983 • Volvo
340-360
Volvo 340-360 1.4 (71 Hp) 1983Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Volvo 340-360
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationVolvo 340-360
AudiMakeVolvo
100Model340-360
1983Model year1983
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationVolvo 340-360
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1400 cc
75 HPPower71 HP
138 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationVolvo 340-360
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationVolvo 340-360
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size—
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationVolvo 340-360
4793 mmLength—
1814 mmWidth—
1422 mmHeight—
1080 KgWeight950 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Audi 100 and 1983 Volvo 340-360 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 340-360 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…