DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Audi 100 vs 1983 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
100ModelSierra
1983Model year1983
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
138 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
4793 mmLength4425 mm
1814 mmWidth1694 mm
1422 mmHeight1407 mm
1080 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Audi 100 and 1983 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…