1982 • Audi
100
Audi 100 1.8 (75 Hp) 1982Overall Score51.25/100
1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 SsangYong Korando Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • SsangYong
Korando
SsangYong Korando 2.2 D (68 Hp) 1982Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Korando
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationSsangYong Korando
AudiMakeSsangYong
100ModelKorando
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationSsangYong Korando
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed125 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement2238 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
138 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationSsangYong Korando
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationSsangYong Korando
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationSsangYong Korando
4793 mmLength3860 mm
1814 mmWidth1700 mm
1422 mmHeight1850 mm
1080 KgWeight1590 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2390 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Audi 100 and 1982 SsangYong Korando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…