DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 Moskvich 2138 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Moskvich 2138

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMoskvich
100Model2138
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1358 cc
75 HPPower50 HP
138 NmTorque92 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size165/80 R13

Dimensions

4793 mmLength4250 mm
1814 mmWidth1550 mm
1422 mmHeight1480 mm
1080 KgWeight1080 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1982 Moskvich 2138 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Moskvich 2138 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…