E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1981 Audi 100 vs 1986 Renault 9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
AudiMakeRenault
100Model9
1981Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
13,4 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1108 cc
85 HPPower48 HP
121 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size145/80 R13

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
4683 mmLength—
1768 mmWidth—
1390 mmHeight—
1110 KgWeight—
2677 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1981 Audi 100 and 1986 Renault 9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1981 Honda AccordVS1981 Audi 100Honda Accord vs Audi 1001981 and 1981 model years1981 Renault 11VS1981 Audi 100Renault 11 vs Audi 1001981 and 1981 model years1981 Lada 2106VS1981 Audi 100Lada 2106 vs Audi 1001981 and 1981 model years1981 Alfa Romeo SpiderVS1981 Audi 100Alfa Romeo Spider vs Audi 1001981 and 1981 model years1981 Opel MantaVS1981 Audi 100Opel Manta vs Audi 1001981 and 1981 model years

Comments are loading…