DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Civic vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeLand Rover
CivicModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1668 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
152 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4438 mmLength4368 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1399 mmHeight1708 mm
1121 KgWeight1510 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Civic and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…