DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1979 Audi 100 vs 1979 Saab 96 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
AudiMakeSaab
100Model96
1979Model year1979
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors2

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
13,4 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
85 HPPower68 HP
121 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank38 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size155/80 SR15

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 96
4680 mmLength4300 mm
1768 mmWidth1590 mm
1390 mmHeight1470 mm
1110 KgWeight930 Kg
2677 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1979 Audi 100 and 1979 Saab 96 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…