DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Honda Airwave vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Airwave

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeFiat
AirwaveModelBravo
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
170 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
143 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
185/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4336 mm
1695 mmWidth1792 mm
1530 mmHeight1498 mm
1160 KgWeight1320 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Honda Airwave and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Airwave leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…