DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Honda Accord vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeVolvo
AccordModelC30
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
222 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2354 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
201 HPPower180 HP
220 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4252 mm
1840 mmWidth1782 mm
1470 mmHeight1447 mm
1702 KgWeight1479 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Honda Accord and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…