DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Accord vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSaab
AccordModel9-3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2204 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4665 mmLength4629 mm
1760 mmWidth1711 mm
1445 mmHeight1428 mm
1470 KgWeight1320 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Accord and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…