DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Honda Accord vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1.75 points.

55.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
AccordModel626
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
208 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower101 HP
184 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4575 mm
1785 mmWidth1710 mm
1395 mmHeight1430 mm
1385 KgWeight1275 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Honda Accord and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…