DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Accord vs 1996 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
AccordModelMX-6
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
185 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
105 HPPower115 HP
210 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4685 mmLength4615 mm
1720 mmWidth1750 mm
1380 mmHeight1310 mm
1405 KgWeight1120 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Accord and 1996 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…