DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Holden UTE vs 2004 Bristol Blenheim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Blenheim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeBristol
UTEModelBlenheim
2009Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,4 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5900 cc
367 HPPower390 HP
530 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
14,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4825 mm
1899 mmWidth1765 mm
1480 mmHeight1440 mm
1786 KgWeight1755 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Holden UTE and 2004 Bristol Blenheim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Blenheim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…