DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden UTE vs 2002 Bristol Blenheim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Blenheim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeBristol
UTEModelBlenheim
2005Model year2002
Pick-upBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,4 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5898 cc
340 HPPower354 HP
470 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4825 mm
1844 mmWidth1765 mm
1476 mmHeight1440 mm
—Weight1740 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden UTE and 2002 Bristol Blenheim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Blenheim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…