DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden UTE vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
UTEModelArmada
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats8
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
340 HPPower309 HP
470 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank106 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
—Average consumption15,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength5255 mm
1844 mmWidth2002 mm
1476 mmHeight1913 mm
—Weight2480 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden UTE and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…