DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden UTE vs 2005 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
HoldenMakeGMC
UTEModelYukon
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats9
2Doors5

Performance

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
—0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
340 HPPower324 HP
470 NmTorque502 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank123 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Holden UTESpecificationGMC Yukon
5052 mmLength5570 mm
1844 mmWidth2002 mm
1476 mmHeight1923 mm
—Weight2310 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase3302 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden UTE and 2005 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…