DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Holden UTE vs 2001 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLand Rover
UTEModelRange Rover
2001Model year2001
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
220 km/hTop speed196 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4553 cc
243 HPPower224 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption22,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption16,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size255/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4713 mm
1794 mmWidth1853 mm
1448 mmHeight1817 mm
1450 KgWeight2220 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Holden UTE and 2001 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…