2002 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.8i V6 (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score70.75/100
2002 Holden UTE vs 1999 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.8i V6 (200 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelUTE
2002Model year1999
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
9,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
304 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
4861 mmLength4861 mm
1794 mmWidth1794 mm
1448 mmHeight1448 mm
1450 KgWeight1450 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Holden UTE and 1999 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Explorer vs Holden UTE2002 and 2002 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Omega vs Holden UTE1999 and 2002 model years
VSImage unavailableHolden Statesman vs Holden UTE1999 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE1999 and 2002 model years
VSImage unavailablePontiac Bonneville vs Holden UTE2005 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…