DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Holden UTE vs 2000 Chevrolet Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
UTEModelOmega
1998Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed216 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
304 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4880 mm
1794 mmWidth1825 mm
1448 mmHeight1440 mm
1450 KgWeight1640 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Holden UTE and 2000 Chevrolet Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…