DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Holden UTE vs 2004 Acura MDX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura MDX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden UTESpecificationAcura MDX
HoldenMakeAcura
UTEModelMDX
2008Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Holden UTESpecificationAcura MDX
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
265 HPPower263 HP
340 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Holden UTESpecificationAcura MDX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank73 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Holden UTESpecificationAcura MDX
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Holden UTESpecificationAcura MDX
5040 mmLength4789 mm
1899 mmWidth1955 mm
1480 mmHeight1744 mm
1735 KgWeight2065 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Holden UTE and 2004 Acura MDX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura MDX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…