DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Holden UTE vs 2014 Acura TL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura TL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden UTESpecificationAcura TL
HoldenMakeAcura
UTEModelTL
2017Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Holden UTESpecificationAcura TL
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3500 cc
245 HPPower280 HP
330 NmTorque254 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Holden UTESpecificationAcura TL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Holden UTESpecificationAcura TL
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
—Tyre sizeP245/50 R17 98V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Holden UTESpecificationAcura TL
5055 mmLength4928 mm
1899 mmWidth1880 mm
1497 mmHeight1452 mm
1697 KgWeight1690 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Holden UTE and 2014 Acura TL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura TL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…