DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Holden UTE vs 2013 Kia Mohave Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Mohave

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeKia
UTEModelMohave
2015Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
245 HPPower274 HP
330 NmTorque369 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,6 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size245/70 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4880 mm
1899 mmWidth1915 mm
1497 mmHeight1810 mm
1697 KgWeight2051 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2895 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Holden UTE and 2013 Kia Mohave approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Mohave leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…