DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Holden UTE vs 2011 Acura RL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden UTESpecificationAcura RL
HoldenMakeAcura
UTEModelRL
2015Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Holden UTESpecificationAcura RL
—0–100 km/h6,7 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3664 cc
245 HPPower304 HP
330 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Holden UTESpecificationAcura RL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank73 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Holden UTESpecificationAcura RL
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
—Tyre size245/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Holden UTESpecificationAcura RL
5055 mmLength4973 mm
1899 mmWidth1847 mm
1497 mmHeight1455 mm
1697 KgWeight1845 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Holden UTE and 2011 Acura RL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…