DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Holden UTE vs 2012 Ford Edge Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Edge

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden UTESpecificationFord Edge
HoldenMakeFord
UTEModelEdge
2015Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Holden UTESpecificationFord Edge
—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
245 HPPower288 HP
330 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Holden UTESpecificationFord Edge
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Holden UTESpecificationFord Edge
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size235/65 R17; 245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Holden UTESpecificationFord Edge
5055 mmLength4679 mm
1899 mmWidth1930 mm
1497 mmHeight1702 mm
1697 KgWeight1935 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Holden UTE and 2012 Ford Edge approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Edge leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…