2014 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.6 V6 (245 Hp) 2014Overall Score73.75/100
2014 Holden UTE vs 2015 Honda Elysion Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Honda
Elysion
Honda Elysion 3.5 V6 24V (205) 2015Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHonda Elysion
HoldenMakeHonda
UTEModelElysion
2014Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
2Seats8
2Doors5
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHonda Elysion
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3474 cc
245 HPPower205 HP
330 NmTorque297 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Holden UTESpecificationHonda Elysion
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHonda Elysion
5055 mmLength4920 mm
1899 mmWidth1845 mm
1497 mmHeight1810 mm
1697 KgWeight2020 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2900 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Holden UTE and 2015 Honda Elysion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableToyota Highlander vs Holden UTE2015 and 2014 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Explorer vs Holden UTE2016 and 2014 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Land Cruiser vs Holden UTE2014 and 2014 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Fortuner vs Holden UTE2015 and 2014 model yearsVSImage unavailableHonda Elysion vs Holden UTE2015 and 2014 model yearsComments are loading…